In 2026, the question is no longer really:
“Can OpenStreetMap truly be used professionally?”
State of the Map 2026 in Paris once again showed that this question has largely been settled.
OSM now serves as the foundation for national reference datasets, is influencing European standardisation work on cycling infrastructure, supports research into data quality, and is part of an increasingly structured professional ecosystem.
Around it, other digital commons are also emerging, such as Panoramax.
At the same time, some talks reminded us of something essential: behind tags, ontologies and data pipelines, a map remains a representation of the world — and therefore the result of choices.
A few reflections, with a cycling-data bias, after three days at #SOTM2026 at Géodata Paris 👇
(french version here)
State of the Map Paris 2026: OpenStreetMap is scaling up
For the first time, the global State of the Map conference took place in France, from August 28 to 30, 2026, in Champs-sur-Marne, near Paris.
The location itself felt quite symbolic. The international OpenStreetMap community gathered at Cité Descartes, including at Géodata Paris, IGN’s school, alongside École nationale des ponts et chaussées and Université Gustave Eiffel.
For three days, contributors, researchers, public authorities, institutions, associations and companies met in a place dedicated to education, research and new uses of geographic data.
This connection between OSM, academia, research, public institutions and professional geodata users actually sums up quite well what I took away from this edition.
A few days after SOTM 2026, one impression stands out:
OpenStreetMap is scaling up.
Of course, OSM has long ceased to be merely “a collaborative map” sitting on the margins of large private or governmental mapping platforms.
But this year’s conference showed particularly clearly how deeply the project is now embedded in professional applications, research, public policy and even standardisation work.
And it was particularly interesting to see this evolution taking place at IGN.
IGN was not only one of the event’s partners. Several topics discussed during the conference — including Panoramax, digital commons and the relationship between institutional datasets and OpenStreetMap — also illustrate a deeper evolution in the relationship between the French institutional geographic ecosystem and OSM.
A few years ago, IGN and OpenStreetMap could easily have been portrayed as two separate, perhaps even competing, worlds. I have quite vivid memories of this opposition from when I studied here myself.
SOTM 2026 told a rather different story:
one of complementarity, commons and collaboration.
Among the many talks, a few topics particularly caught my attention.
OSM is starting to inspire cycling standards
The presentation “How OSM inspires CEN standards for cycling infrastructure”, by Tu-Tho Thai, sent a strong signal.
As part of European work on the digital description of cycling infrastructure, the Cyclinfra project is examining OpenStreetMap tags and mapping practices.
OSM is therefore no longer simply adapting itself to institutional standards.
It is also starting to inspire them.
France’s Base Nationale des Aménagements Cyclables (BNAC) — the National Cycling Infrastructure Database — follows a similar approach: using OSM as a source, transforming the data into a national data schema, and enabling public authorities to improve the shared OSM dataset in return.
For cycling, this convergence between OSM, national datasets and European standards is particularly promising.
It is also very close to what we have been promoting within the Geodata team at Geovelo.
When mapping a pothole becomes political
The discussions around “The democratic stakes of mapmaking”, with Ksenia Ermoshina, Christian Quest and Françoise Bahoken among others, were a useful reminder of something that is often overlooked:
Mapping is a political act.
A simple example illustrates this well.
Mapping potholes or problems in public space may seem trivial. But making those issues visible also makes it possible to assess public policies and helps residents organise or advocate for improvements.
Choosing what we represent, what we describe, and what we leave invisible is already a decision.
Technical choices in a database or a map are therefore never entirely neutral.
Panoramax: a new geographic common
Panoramax was also highly visible throughout the conference — starting right from the opening session.
That was particularly satisfying for us at Geovelo, as we helped fund the first viewer back in 2021, when the project was still called GeoVisio.
Panoramax provides a free, open and federated alternative for sharing street-level imagery.
Its value is not only in the photographs themselves.
Its architecture is equally important: multiple organisations can host their own imagery while remaining connected through a common federation.
Like OpenStreetMap, Panoramax demonstrates that it is possible to build an open, decentralised geographic infrastructure that does not depend on a single provider.
The French Federation of OSM Professionals is helping structure the ecosystem
The French Federation of OpenStreetMap Professionals, of which Geovelo is a member, was also very visible during the event: through its booth, talks, discussions with participants and an OpenStreetMap TV studio.
This reflects another important evolution.
Over the past few years, a genuine professional ecosystem has been developing around OpenStreetMap.
The Federation brings together companies and professionals working in mobility, accessibility, energy, urban planning, tourism, GIS tools, data quality and other fields.
Its purpose is not simply to represent businesses using OSM.
It also builds bridges with public authorities, explains the ODbL licence, documents professional uses of OSM and advocates for the commons-based model.
We also followed several more technical and applied-research topics.
Making OSM easier to use
Jake Low’s presentation “Sourdough and Layercake” addressed another major challenge: OpenStreetMap’s complexity.
Sourdough provides vector tiles that remain close to the logic of OSM tags.
Layercake transforms OSM data into thematic layers, including in GeoParquet format.
The objective is straightforward: allow more people to work with OSM data in tools such as QGIS, DuckDB or notebooks without first having to master the full complexity of PBF files, relations and tagging conventions.
Making OSM easier to access without losing the connection to the original data is probably one of the major challenges facing the ecosystem.
Understanding changes in OpenStreetMap
The work presented by Camille Bernard and Pedro Pinheiro focused on detecting and semantically annotating changes in OpenStreetMap.
Their research was presented as:
Bernard, C., Pinheiro, P., & Viry, M. (2026). Detection and Semantic Annotation of Changes in OpenStreetMap Data. OSM Science 2026 at State of the Map 2026.
Detecting that an object has changed is relatively easy.
Understanding why it changed is much harder.
Imagine that a cycleway suddenly appears in OSM.
Was the infrastructure actually just built?
Was it already present on the ground but had never been mapped?
Was it simply a tagging correction?
Or a geometry improvement?
Being able to distinguish between these situations is essential when analysing how a territory evolves.
This is something we will be following closely.
Comparing the number of kilometres of cycleways in OSM between two dates is not enough. We need to distinguish changes in the real world from changes in how the real world is represented in OSM.
OSM is no longer just a map
Although, to be fair, it probably never was.
All these examples tell a similar story:
- Panoramax is building a new commons around street-level imagery.
- Sourdough and Layercake are making OSM data easier to use.
- The Federation of OSM Professionals is helping structure an economic ecosystem while building bridges with public institutions.
- Research is helping us better understand how OSM data evolves.
- European cycling standards are beginning to learn from OpenStreetMap.
- Discussions about mapping remind us that technical choices can also have democratic consequences.
The question is therefore no longer really whether OpenStreetMap can be used professionally or institutionally.
That has already been answered.
The more interesting questions are now:
-
How do we industrialise without closing things down?
-
How do we standardise without oversimplifying?
-
How do we professionalise without taking ownership away from the community?
That is what I will remember from State of the Map 2026 in Paris.
OpenStreetMap is no longer simply a map that we improve feature by feature.
It is an infrastructure and a digital common around which tools, companies, standards, research and public policies are now being built.
Geovelo at SOTM 2026
We also contributed two presentations during the conference:
- Geovelo & cycling infrastructure, a discussion in the SOTM TV studio, in French.
- “How OpenStreetMap became the backbone of France’s National Cycling Database”, presenting the history of the BNAC and making the case for the relationship between institutional cycling data and OpenStreetMap.
A busy State of the Map, and plenty of ideas to bring home.
See you at the next one!