Hi folks! I’m up for election to HOT’s voting membership this year (thank you, Pete!). As a part of that process, I’m posting my answers to their prompting questions here on my OSM diary.
I know that I already owe this community a summary of my previous research within the OpenStreetMap ecosystem – and what’s changed since then. By way of explanation and apology: I wanted to flag that I will be giving a talk at this year’s State of the Map in Paris with an update on my previous work. You can see the talk I gave in 2022 here. I also gave a talk at the HOT Summit in 2021.
I also want to flag that no LLMs were used in the writing of these answers: while I do use them sometimes for more functional, repetitive, or iterative work, I did not use them below. Writing is often a form of thinking for me, and for these answers, I wanted to prioritize that process.
What does HOT mean to you?
In the last 6 or so years, HOT has both professionally and personally changed how I think about technology, community, and crises. It’s also meant different things at different times for me – which I wrote a bit more about in the question below.
In short: I’ve come to see HOT (and humanitarian mapping more broadly) as a kind of canary in the coal mine for the broader technology ecosystem at large. The questions I found here, at HOT and across OSM are ones that I have later found in the broader ecosystems they feed into (and even the world at large): questions about navigating permacrises, about AI, about shifts in funding landscapes, about ethical dilemmas for data pipelines, about cross-cultural community-building, and many, many others.
How did you become involved with HOT?
I have perhaps an unusual path to being involved with HOT: I was an anthropologist and ethnographer of the ecosystem of humanitarian mapping that HOT feeds into before becoming involved as a mapper and facilitator in the past few years.
During my MA from 2019-2022, HOT and the humanitarian mapping ecosystem was the research ‘field site’ for my MA, meaning a place I ‘went to’ in order to ‘do research’, something that anthropologists call “participant observation”. As a part of that process, I spoke to a number of mappers within HOT and in the broader mapping ecosystem, tried my best not to be extractive during the research process, and shared my own knowledge openly in return. Pretty much everyone I spoke to was kind and open to speaking with me, which I really appreciated. The whole process was incredibly formative, even as I shared critical research about the nature of humanitarianism, or even about HOT itself and the broader ecosystem of work and economic processes that it might point towards, according to the literature.
This experience led directly to me wanting to contribute to the same processes I had observed and tried to understand as a researcher, so I went from studying digital communities to managing and stewarding them.
Since 2022, I’ve become a kind of ‘open ecosystem practitioner’, working as a facilitator and most recently as a kind of ‘mapping artist’ at a variety of organisations: with the Alan Turing Institute, Internet Society, British Red Cross, and Open Knowledge Foundation to name a few. This took me to worlds outside of humanitarian response, but enabled me to return to facilitate a call on AI-assisted mapping with HOT’s Community Working Group back in 2023, and inadvertently made me see HOT in a different light as well.
Working in parallel spaces to humanitarian technology for the past few years has made me reflect with more nuance about the role that HOT plays not only within humanitarian response, but in the broader political landscape it is a part of (and lies in parallel to).
Can you share your involvement in HOT, mapping, and/or humanitarian response?
A few years later, I now organise mapathons for the Missing Maps project on behalf of the British Red Cross as a professional facilitator. I sometimes consult with various members of the mapping research and tech ecosystem, join in-person and remote mapathons with the London Missing Maps and Geomob folks, and make art (usually related to maps). I’ve also (very) slowly started to map my neighborhood and hikes, which has been a totally different entry point to mapping entirely. I still wouldn’t call myself an expert mapper to this day - though I’m perhaps more of an expert in ‘communities’ more than anything else, and a translator between different parts of the ‘mapping supply chain’.
Why do you want to become a voting member?
I see this as an opportunity to re-engage with the HOT community in a more formalized way, and to share many of the skills and experiences I’ve learned over the past years in similar and aligned spaces. This gives me both a structure and a format to do so, especially as someone that now finds myself stretched across a few different projects.
As a voting member, what do you see as your most important responsibility?
What I see as perhaps my most important responsibility is the same reason why I’d like to become a voting member: to be a contributor and supporter of a project that I’ve learned a lot from, and to represent a perspective that might not be currently represented within the voting membership, particularly one informed by critical-scholarship.
What do you see as HOT’s greatest challenge, and how would you help address it?
I think we’re in a very challenging time for the type of work that HOT does on a few levels. On one hand, I remember that my research revealed questions and vulnerabilities within the mapping supply chain itself (things like satellite imagery issues, for example!), or the rise of AI-assisted mapping and its implications for data quality (amidst other data quality questions with beginner mappers). These problems are still endemic, though they have evolved.
Secondly, as an ecosystem actor, I can see the wider issues of funding and sustainability that are absolutely gutting the humanitarian and non-profit space, and I’m keen to support sustainable and ethical work during this challenging period.
To address these issues, I obviously think deep, strategic work is important, as well as connecting to allies and other aligned folks facing similar issues. Perhaps we might look to other ecosystems outside of humanitarian response - and to others with an aligned ethos.